Exodus 19
Al Stewart, Bishop of Wollongong describes the power of God to deliver His people from slavery and…
![]() |
|
![]() |
| SYDNEY sydney stories southern cross events breaking news positions vacant media releases MISSION MATTERS |
CULTURE |
Lost sight of main game
Reading the article ‘Managing Risks at Church’ in the July edition of Southern Cross gave me great concern. To me, the phrase ‘maximise ministry by minimising harm’ is yet another hoop for us to jump through with no real gain.
Yes, we will look more like an efficient business but are we losing sight of the main game?
Surely the main focus should be on reaching people with the saving message of Jesus and encouraging spiritual growth, rather than operating like a company business.
Lay workers, parish councils and clergy are being asked to complete more and more paperwork, attend special training programs etc. taking up valuable time that could be spent in ministry.
It is hard enough to get people to go on church committees and in particular become a warden without loading them down with yet another millstone.
I have spent many years as a church warden, parish council, Synod member, and led a number of lay ministries including youth and children’s work.
This has been in both Sydney and country areas. Please don’t load us with another burden or we will end up with nobody willing to take on these roles.
Ron Bower
Kangaroo Valley, NSW
Empty tomb, empty logic
In neither Romans 4:25 nor 1 Corinthians 15:14, or anywhere else, does Paul claim that the resurrection is ‘the most critical element of the gospel story!’ (Haydn Sennitt SC, July). Christ’s miraculous birth, his morally perfect life, death, resurrection, ascension and the sending of his Holy Spirit, all in fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy and promise, are equally important, necessary parts of his single complex act of redemption. Without any one of them the rest are meaningless and our preaching would indeed be empty. To argue otherwise is both theologically dangerous and absurd.
Jim Bates
Bilgola, NSW
Super hero Christians or the bad guys in a culture war?
I am writing in regard to your culture watch article ‘We might be Superheroes’ (SC, July), specifically your ‘Talking Point’ inset box. The main issue is the statement, ‘Explain sin is a ‘mutation’ and Jesus won us the cure’.
Firstly, this implies that sin is something beyond our control and something that we have no influence over. Of course, we are all sinful people, but we do have some control over the extremes.
I do not believe that conceptually this idea can be supported biblically. Secondly, the concept is incongruous with the idea of comparing the X Men and Christianity – it is the mutation that sets the X Men apart from the rest of humanity. Obviously if we extend the analogy, we have sin being what sets Christians apart. Plainly this is not the case, as all sin. The separation lies in our ideologies.
Lastly, the statement itself suggests that whoever wrote it, has not seen the final X Men movie, or completely missed the point. The ‘cure’ is not a good thing, it suggests that the ‘Mutants’ are of less worth than normal humans. To make that statement, you are aligning yourself with the bigotted ‘bad guys’ of the film, who are not averse to forcing the ‘cure’ on mutants as well as weaponising the ‘cure’ for their own benefit. It was this last element that caused my sister (a marginal Christian) to exclaim in disgust and not read any further. Obviously it irritated me enough to write this letter. For me, it constitutes as pretty poor on behalf of the writer, as whatever good elements of the article there are, are overshadowed by the looming, self-confessed ignorance.
Stephen Kirkaldy
Email address supplied
Unintelligent design
John Reimer (SC, May) confidently recommends Intelligent Design (ID), but fails to mention that the ID debate had an extended hearing last year in the District Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, where ID was defended during court appearances by well-known supporters of ID, including Professor Michael Behe, probably the best known ID scientist. ID was judged to be an untestable belief, and is simply already-discredited Creationism with names and titles changed. In his letter, John Reimer, in criticising atheistic proponents of Darwin’s theory of evolution, also states that “we now know much more about the world than was the case in Darwin’s time”. Our increasing knowledge of the world confirms the basic concepts of the theory of evolution, which is now so widely accepted by atheistic and by Christian scientists, as well.
Harry Bullock
St Ives, NSW
Click here to comment on this article for the next edition of Southern Cross
Latest articles in sc articles
- Big Decisions December 2008 - 1 day, 19 hours ago
- Paul Barnett’s work honoured - 1 day, 19 hours ago
- Bob Carr backs ‘right to discriminate’ - 1 day, 19 hours ago

Kel Richards and Dean Phillip Jensen discuss recent insights into the Sydney Diocese made by Mark Driscoll.…
Visit the forum »LATEST THREAD:Sheldon Ryan 02/12/2008 06:43pm
|
more jobs events classifieds