AUDIO
![]() |
Phillip Jensen speaks on Anger as part of a series on emotions in the Christian life, delivered at the Australia Day Convention 2010
|
Thanks so much to the 140 senior ministers and 1000-plus readers who have responded to our recent surveys.
I have been personally heartened by the overwhelming support for retaining Southern Cross. Given the options, I actually didn’t expect that level of positive feedback. Details of the survey results will be released in upcoming editions of Southern Cross.
Myself and Allan Dowthwaite, Anglican Media’s CEO, have been trawling through the very many helpful comments and pieces of advice.
We still need to talk in more depth with key stakeholders – including some of our most supportive parishes – to clarify a way forward.
But here is an initial response to five common suggestions made by readers:
1. Why not merge with The Briefing?
I am not sure what my friends Paul Grimmond and Tony Payne at Matthias Media would say about that!
If it’s not obvious, we are separate organisations with different aims.
The Briefing (I believe) is aimed at a particular niche reader across a very wide geography: equipping church leaders across the English-speaking world.
Southern Cross aims to resource a mass audience but serve a local ministry area: equipping the majority of ordinary Sydney Anglican church members for the task of fulfilling the Diocese’s Mission goals.
Its hard to see how you could square those different objectives.
Indeed do senior ministers really want to see Southern Cross move (to put it crassly) into The Briefing’s niche?
Grimmo you can relax! They don’t.
Clearly there are existing publications – such as The Briefing – doing a great job of meeting this need,
We did ask clergy which style of publication would be most effective for resourcing their ministry. The largest number of clergy not only said they preferred the current ‘mass media’ Southern Cross format, and that it was the most effective of all existing communication tools for that purpose.
Only five per cent of senior ministers said they want the Diocese to produce a publication aimed at congregational leaders.
But in saying all this, we are very serious about exploring opportunities to partner with like-minded organisations.
2. Why not just have individual subscriptions?
We already have many individual subscribers. Together with bulk subscriptions outside Sydney Diocese, they represent about seven percent of our readership.
The reason we are reluctant to move to a full subscription basis is that our aim, as mentioned above, is to provide the Diocese with a mass communication tool. Why? Because a ‘mass’ communication strategy – as our research proves – is the best way we can help equip the bulk of lay people for the Mission.
A full subscription service would be a niche publication. Unlike the US, Australian media culture is not one that accepts mass subscription publications.
However these readers are right to suggest that we will need a strategy to grow our subscription base.
3. Why not print in black and white?
Modern printing techniques mean there is no longer a significant cost difference between colour printing and black and white. The drop in advertising revenue that would follow would be far greater than any savings in print cost.
4. Can you save costs by reducing the size?
This is definitely an option. That said, the current tabloid format is actually quite cheap when compared to other options. In fact we have recently discovered the A4 size is more expensive than our existing format because of the set up of large-run printing presses. In the overall mix of costs associated with producing SC, printing is actually the smallest component and getting cheaper due to fierce competition in the industry.
5. Aren’t you printing too many copies?
Getting the right number of copies to each parish has proved tricky. But we don’t want wastage, so let’s see if we can get the parish orders right. Ultimately we rely on senior ministers to order the right number of copies.
Yes, some parishes have leftover copies that get thrown away. But we also have direct evidence that some parishioners are unable to get a copy because their church has not ordered enough and the copies there get snapped up quickly.
That said, reducing waste, while a good thing, will not provide the savings required. Our print run is 23,000 copies and at this volume, our per unit cost is very low.
So in order to ensure you keep receiving Southern Cross, we would prefer parishes order one copy for every household and commit volunteers to handing them out.
In the current environment it might be a case of use it or lose it.


So does anyone want to push me further on any of these issues?
I'm particularly interested in what people might think about a very small format ie A5.. that could be inserted into a church bulletin.
This would means cutting out about 80-90% of the current content.
The flip side is that the surveys suggest the readers (you guys) do really want longer, feature style pieces. That would be impossible in an A5 format.
Here a few initial responses.
1. There is no hard evidence that Anglican Media would be $$ better off if SC went entirely online - in fact I expect we would be worse off. At the moment printing and mailing SC is 1/4 of our budget. The rest is staffing, other production and admin costs that will not change. Into 2010 the entire costs of producing and staffing Sc will need to come from advertising and other revenues apart from our Synod grant. So the issue is would 80-90% of our advertising revenue follow us online. I am highly doubtful, especially if readership falls.
2. I think the best evidence we have at the moment is that the web is not an appropriate medium for a mass readership news-magazine style publication. The 2006 NCLS showed that only 30% of Sydney Anglicans regularly read news online while 80% regularly read newspapers/magazines. Given that this appears to be what key stakeholders want from Anglican Media moving online would be a strange decision.
4. You are also correct that it will mean SC will never be read by the casual or fringe church attender. Utilising Sc for evangelistic purpose (which we have done) will not be possible.
5. Can I also strongly say that the 'print is dead' headlines are overblown in my opinion. There is no hard evidence that the web is a replacement for news-magazines. People consume news differently depending on the medium. In fact many people (and not just oldies) just won't read articles online. For example my wife reads newspapers and magazines but she never reads news online - she uses the web for catching up with friends (Facebook etc). Can the web replace the existing Southern Cross? I don't think it can. The web has a role in serving Sydney Anglicans. But it is a different role.
years. We need to use those funds now to support Christian organisations through very lean times and know the joy of living by faith!
He means 1/4 of the Southern Cross budget, not 1/4 of Anglican Media's total budget. :-)
The short answer is that before the GFC the difference between ad revenue and the production/distribution costs of the paper (including staff time for writing etc) was about $10,000 an issue or $110,000 a year. This gap is covered by using part of our synod grant, with the synod money being directed at staff who also contribute to this website and other areas of our work.
Our difficulty is that we're not only facing a cut to synod funding next year, but we're already experiencing a drop in ad revenue because of the GFC. In 2009 we're looking at $70,000 less in positions vacant ads alone compared to 2008. So, now the gap becomes $180,000.
If you know a bunch of people willing to donate that sort of money, I'd love to hear from you.
Seeing you have had such a great response to your survey I think there is genuine concern among the readership the SC continues and also a strong possibility that people would be prepared to give.
I read the financial pages of the newspapers and I can't help thinking we have to do something like corporations are doing all over the world.
They are raising funds from their existing shareholders to bolster their balance sheets and in the majority of cases their share issues are being oversubsubscribed! I would hasten to add that some of these funds would be coming from Christian shareholders.
Faced with the possibility that SC might not be published anymore I believe
people would respond with generous donations.
I know that unlike shareholders in companies this investment is in the Kingdom of God and there may not be any earthly returns but we know that God is no man's debtor and our reward will certainly be in heaven.
It is no fault of the SC team that the syndod grant will not be available and under those circumstances people will view things in a different light
seeing the loss of the grant has in no way been SC's doing.
The Southern Cross is an integral part of the Sydney Diocese and plays a vital part in advancing the Kingdom of God. It should be preserved.
I exhort you to pray and request the readership to give and wait on God to provide. Mal 3:10
Thanks Phillip. This is very much a live issue. The answer is 'yes' its under pressure now.
I need to clearly explain to my superiors the implications of this direction. I don't think its fully appreciated by everyone as some will know from my debate with Andrew katay elsewhere.
We have already had complaints this year because we have taken adverts from Christian competitors to our Diocesan organisations. We have had to do this because of the slump in job adverts.
If the grant isn't there do we take adverts from highly commercial entities like Disney (we have had approaches in the past to run Disney competitions) or dare I say Hillsong?
Do we let SC die because we are not willing to take such advertising?
Someone is going to have to make some hard calls.