AUDIO

by Phillip Jensen
Phillip Jensen speaks on Anger as part of a series on emotions in the Christian life, delivered at the Australia Day Convention 2010
LATEST COMMENTS
3 hours 16 minutes 12 seconds
Ian Welch commented on We all win at press awards
Our best and worst websites
Steve Kryger
June 11th, 2009

I’ve been perusing the websites that make up the online footprint of our diocese. I’ve clicked my way from Albion Park on the South Coast, to York Street in the CBD. I feel like I’ve visited most of our churches as I’ve explored our websites. 

Our worst mistakes

There were a number of common web mistakes – roadblocks if you like. Is your church website guilty of the following?

1 Info that’s past its use-by date

Where the internet is concerned, content is king and the more relevant it is, the better. However I’ve clicked on links to “Download this week’s news” – and the news was dated February 8, 2009. Some sites haven’t been updated since Easter; others haven’t been updated in a year. There is no more important task on your website than ensuring you have up-to-date, accurate content.

2 Dead links
On one site most of the links I clicked displayed “404 – Page not found”. On another there was a link to “All about you”. Curious, I clicked and was redirected to the website of another church! Do an inventory of your links - dead ends and error messages won’t encourage visitors on or off line.

3 Content overkill
Some websites love content too much. I can understand why: your church has a lot going on and you want people to be aware. But for the visitor it’s just overwhelming. Avoid a busy homepage with a clear and logical navigation menu.

4 Dodgy videos

Churches are experimenting with video welcome messages. Often these videos are great, with well-scripted content. However, too many are poorly filmed or badly edited, detracting from the main idea. Clear sound, good lighting, uncluttered backgrounds and a simple message can make all the difference.

5 Cringe-worthy clip-art
Let me state the obvious: ugly images are hard to look at, and therefore don’t encourage visitors to stick around. Yet some sites persist in using images from clip-art galleries that detract, rather than enhance the experience for the visitor.

6 “More info to come”

One classic mistake is messages like ‘More info to come’ or ‘Under construction’. These appear on quite a few of our websites. These promises can often persist for years! If you don’t have the content yet don’t put the link up.

7. Painful colours

A good colour scheme is both essential for a good user experience, and necessary for meeting accessibility requirements. Ask how colour-blind visitors, or the vision-impaired would deal with your site.

Our best websites

There will always be room to improve, but Sydney Anglicans also have lots of good content and great online features. Here are seven examples to get you thinking:

1 Simple and uncomplicated

If you don’t have a lot to say, don’t over-complicate things. St Philip’s York Street has a simple site, light on content, but what it says, it says well, and the contact details and service times are easy to see.

2 Clear service times
And those are some of the most important pieces of information. Your service times should be displayed loud and proud. Bobbin Head Anglican, Wentworthville Anglican and Helensburgh Anglican make it very easy to find out when and where to go.

3 Friendly faces
Church is about people. St Mark’s, Avalon has a great staff page with well-taken photos and friendly, easy-to-read biographies. Meadowbank International Church has utilised images of people on the homepage to create a welcoming feel. 

4 Thinking like an outsider
Some churches have worked hard to make their websites attractive to newcomers. Greystanes-Merrylands West Anglican Church has a clear welcome message to visitors; Valley Heights Community Church has a section called ‘Sundays’ with FAQs like “How long does it go for?”, “What about my children?” and “What should I wear?”. Remember, church is not a familiar place for most Australian web users.

5 More about Christianity

People may not come into our churches but that shouldn’t stop us from sharing the good news with them. Kiama Anglican Churches has a link on the homepage to ‘What is a Christian?’; St James’, Minto has a page of apologetic videos featuring Lee Strobel; and Summer Hill Anglican provides a link to “Christianity” with details of its Christianity Explored course.

6 Social media
West Ryde Anglican Church is experimenting with social media (Facebook, MySpace, and more) as a way of communicating with its members. St Faith’s, Narrabeen has similar tools as well as a novel “Ask a Minister” section. A number of churches like St Matthew’s Ashbury maintain blogs.

Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
Over at Communicate Jesus I've shared "22 functional and inspirational church websites", with links to 10 of the best websites in our Diocese, plus 12 great church websites from overseas.

#1 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
I'm also keen to hear - which websites do you think are the best (and worst) in the Diocese? What do you think makes them good, or not so good?

#2 of 30 top
Joshua Meier    1 year, 2 months ago
Is there a place to have a separate night church/young adult webpage? How do you make a page accessable and appealing for the very techno savy and those who grew up before computers?

#3 of 30 top
Joshua Meier    1 year, 2 months ago
The majority of church websites are immediate turn off's.
The appearance (colour scheme and layout) of many pages can lead to cringing. The internet is a virtual doorstep and most companies and bodies have somthing professional done up.
The best websites are those that have new info updated weekly, with services, upcoming youth events, prayer meetings etc, things that show the church is active and open. This ususlly involves people from each ministery able to access the sections pertaining to their ministery, with the rector having control over the rest.

As a side thought, should all the churches in the diocese have similar schemes, for consistency or 'branding' purposes?

#4 of 30 top
Justin Moffatt    1 year, 2 months ago
Hey Steve. What is your assessment of St Mark's Darling Point? It is my current favourite.

#5 of 30 top
Elly Byrne    1 year, 2 months ago
Darling Point page takes far too long to load. But once it has loaded everything changes instantly.
What is the fascination with small pale text?
At least it doesn't have white text on a black background. That would be the worst.

#6 of 30 top
Christine Semple    1 year, 2 months ago
Might I add Steve, that for this year it's extremely helpful for our churches to include the Connect09 logo on their home page, which is linked to the connect09.com website. This will help people make the link to a church where they might have seen a Connect09 banner displayed outside. Or if they find the church via the church database on the connect09.com website.

#7 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
On a number of websites in the Diocese I've seen the phrase "This website is developed and maintained by Church X and does not necessarily represent the view of the Anglican Church Diocese of Sydney or the Sydney Diocesan Secretariat." Does anyone know if that phrase is a requirement on Sydney Anglican church websites?

#8 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
There's a lot to like about St Mark's, Darling Point:

- the pictures are of people and are warm and friendly (and reflect the fact that church is about people).
- information about service times, contact details, location (and even public transport modes) is clear.
- there's a page with information for people who are new to the church.
- upcoming events are listed on the homepage and are (with one exception), up to date.

Lots to learn and be encouraged by.

#9 of 30 top
Allan Dowthwaite    1 year, 2 months ago
From what I've seen most church websites make one major error: they're not sure who the 'audience' is.

That is, they haven't asked the question, is this primarily for the outsider to find out about and connect with the church, or is it primarily for the insider as a 'community' builder (and for keeping the congregation informed).

The answer to that question will drive the design.

I think the St Marks, Avalon site you linked to is fantastic. It's clearly targeted at the outsider, but all the info an insider needs is there with a bit of digging (which I think is the right approach). It's uncluttered,and easy to navigate. If I lived on the Northern Beaches, I'd definitely visit this church.

#10 of 30 top
Allan Dowthwaite    1 year, 2 months ago
Steve, to answer your question in #9. There's no requirement for the use of this phrase on all church websites, but the Secretariat provides hosting services for a number of parishes and it may be part of their policy.

#11 of 30 top
Craig Schafer    1 year, 2 months ago
is this primarily for the outsider to find out about and connect with the church, or is it primarily for the insider as a 'community' builder (and for keeping the congregation informed).


Just want to second, third and fourth that.

It can raise another question as people like Steve flog us clergy to blog. Do the things I want to blog about fit the purpose of our website? stmarks.com.au is designed for outsiders considering visiting our church. This includes non-Christians. I've just started blogging but my blog is really intended to let me think about pastoral ministry 'outloud' and interact with others in similar or related circumstances. I want to be able to use church jargon and refer to books that non-Christians will think weird, talk about controversies and stuff like that. As a consequence my blog links to the church website, but the church website does not link to my blog? Do you reckon that makes sense?

#12 of 30 top
Tom Melbourne    1 year, 2 months ago
Thanks for these articles Steve.

I'd love some reflections from y'all on the website I am currently putting together for my church out in Emu Plains:
http://www.emuplains.anglican.asn.au/

It's not 100% complete yet (and I am guilty of Mistake #6!), but what things could I be doing better? Do you think a blogroll on the main page is a good idea, or a separate page better?

#13 of 30 top
Craig Schafer    1 year, 2 months ago
I love a website that starts with a photo of happy looking, real people.

#14 of 30 top
Graham Clarke    1 year, 2 months ago
We've just relaunched our church site: The Lakes Evangelical Church

(Okay we're not Anglican - but we're part of Connect09, does that count?).

#15 of 30 top
Jeremy Halcrow    1 year, 2 months ago
Craig S said:

Do you reckon that makes sense?


yep. sounds wise.

#16 of 30 top
David McKay    1 year, 2 months ago
Steve, thank you so much for all your hard work. How difficult is it to create sites like your 22 top ones? Does it require a specialist? I've managed our church website with notepad and html and a bit of php [just copying and pasting] but it is a bit harder to do with a vista computer, I've found.

Whenever I try to use a program [which supposedly makes it easier] I fall on my face and give up.

Our site does look dodgy. I'd love to get it like some of the ones you've highlighted. but how?

#17 of 30 top
Geoff Orchard    1 year, 2 months ago
It's great to see our people embracing new technology, or trying; in an effort to provide access for those searching for a Church, or trying to find answers. I agree that Websites should be uncluttered, clear in message, provide clear links to other pages or external sites. It's a shame we don't have resources to set up a site like Christian Web hosting - Ark Webs http://www.arkwebs.com/ss-features.html, which allows you to build your site from preset templates. Maybe we should have a workshop to help, as if you don't have anyone in your congregation it can be quite expensive to set up.
I think the other major problem you mentioned is KEEP IT UP TO DATE. It you want to set up a Web site, think about who is going to maintain it. Remember, if we intend to glorify Jesus in all we do, do it exceptionally well.

#18 of 30 top
Kevin John Keep    1 year, 2 months ago
Steve, I couldn't agree with you more! As a webmaster to several websites, more particularly www.australianchurches.net, your comments are so succinct and true.
It irks me to see some church web sites that are dated, their email addresses are more than their allowance thereby stopping others coming in, and so on. Surely these bad sites puts Christians in a low light when we should indeed be the light of the world through the Holy Spirit.
Keep up the good work of upholding the faith in a practical way.

Kevin

#19 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
Allan raises a good point - we need to know who our audience (or audiences) are. I don't think we need to have just one audience, in fact there are two clear audiences in my mind. 1. church members/regular attenders, and 2. people who are considering coming along. In this way our websites are similar to the website of a bank - they exist both for current and potential customers.

#20 of 30 top
Allan Dowthwaite    1 year, 2 months ago
Steve, I'm with you on the 2 audiences, but I would make non-members the primary audience, and put members in second place. I mean this not in terms of importance, but in thinking through site design.

I think a church site should make it easy for the outsider to get the info they want and help create a good impression of the church, even if that means the member has to do a bit more digging to find the prayer points or details of the upcoming youth camp etc.

Trying to build a site that gives both groups equal importance would probably lead to a confused design.

#21 of 30 top
Clayton Fopp    1 year, 2 months ago
We're in the process of re-thinking the websites across the Trinity network of churches in Adelaide and in fact launched a new site for a 2010 church plant just yesterday.

We operate with 3 audiences in mind; the 2 mentioned by Steve - members and potential visitors, but we also want to resource Christians who will never visit our churches, ie in other countries. It's astounding how many visitors download sermon recordings and Bible studies from the sorts of countries you'd think of as being "closed." This group is actually the biggest user of some of our sites (by bandwidth) because some of them will just download almost the entire sermon library!

We're trying to design our sites in such a way that whichever "category" of visitor someone is, the pathway to the information they're looking for is obvious from the front page, right through.

#22 of 30 top
Kevin John Keep    1 year, 2 months ago
Re #10 I agree. If you aim at nothing you are sure to hit it.

Kevin

#23 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
Clayton, I'm really excited to hear how your websites are being used by people around the world.

The internet provides an almost limitless audience for our content, and what better incentive to have an easy-to-use, up-to-date, content-rich website than to remember that all of our websites have the potential to be visited by many people who may never walk into our churches.

In April I wrote about some of the exciting gospel advancements taking place in 'closed' countries as a result of the internet, see "4 million in 2 years".

#24 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
I sympathise with you David, and I'm keen to help churches that don't have the in-house expertise to build a good website.

I'm currently building a website for a new church plant (using a professional template to show how these can be customised, and also look good). I'm documenting the process, to share with churches how they can create similar websites for themselves, without the need to do a course in web development!

#25 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
A couple more comments related to this post have been made here.

#26 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
Just came across this message on the homepage of one of our church websites:

"Congratulations! You've found the new location for our website. Hopefully in early 2007 this site will be fully live."

#27 of 30 top
Jeremy Halcrow    1 year, 2 months ago
Heh Steve, I hope you are letting the parishes know about these problems and mistakes!

#28 of 30 top
Steve Kryger    1 year, 2 months ago
That's a good point Jeremy, I should do that. I had made a point of not publicising which churches have the worst websites, but I should let them know if there's things they can do to quickly improve their sites. This isn't made easy however, when a lot of them don't even have email address published!

#29 of 30 top
Roger Gallagher    1 year, 2 months ago
Hi Steve,

Their email addresses should be listed in the Diocesan Yearbook

#30 of 30 top
Commenting is not available in this section entry.