AUDIO
![]() |
Phillip Jensen speaks on Anger as part of a series on emotions in the Christian life, delivered at the Australia Day Convention 2010
|
I’ve been perusing the websites that make up the online footprint of our diocese. I’ve clicked my way from Albion Park on the South Coast, to York Street in the CBD. I feel like I’ve visited most of our churches as I’ve explored our websites.
Our worst mistakes
There were a number of common web mistakes – roadblocks if you like. Is your church website guilty of the following?
1 Info that’s past its use-by date
Where the internet is concerned, content is king and the more relevant it is, the better. However I’ve clicked on links to “Download this week’s news” – and the news was dated February 8, 2009. Some sites haven’t been updated since Easter; others haven’t been updated in a year. There is no more important task on your website than ensuring you have up-to-date, accurate content.
2 Dead links
On one site most of the links I clicked displayed “404 – Page not found”. On another there was a link to “All about you”. Curious, I clicked and was redirected to the website of another church! Do an inventory of your links - dead ends and error messages won’t encourage visitors on or off line.
3 Content overkill
Some websites love content too much. I can understand why: your church has a lot going on and you want people to be aware. But for the visitor it’s just overwhelming. Avoid a busy homepage with a clear and logical navigation menu.
4 Dodgy videos
Churches are experimenting with video welcome messages. Often these videos are great, with well-scripted content. However, too many are poorly filmed or badly edited, detracting from the main idea. Clear sound, good lighting, uncluttered backgrounds and a simple message can make all the difference.
5 Cringe-worthy clip-art
Let me state the obvious: ugly images are hard to look at, and therefore don’t encourage visitors to stick around. Yet some sites persist in using images from clip-art galleries that detract, rather than enhance the experience for the visitor.
6 “More info to come”
One classic mistake is messages like ‘More info to come’ or ‘Under construction’. These appear on quite a few of our websites. These promises can often persist for years! If you don’t have the content yet don’t put the link up.
7. Painful colours
A good colour scheme is both essential for a good user experience, and necessary for meeting accessibility requirements. Ask how colour-blind visitors, or the vision-impaired would deal with your site.
Our best websites
There will always be room to improve, but Sydney Anglicans also have lots of good content and great online features. Here are seven examples to get you thinking:
1 Simple and uncomplicated
If you don’t have a lot to say, don’t over-complicate things. St Philip’s York Street has a simple site, light on content, but what it says, it says well, and the contact details and service times are easy to see.
2 Clear service times
And those are some of the most important pieces of information. Your service times should be displayed loud and proud. Bobbin Head Anglican, Wentworthville Anglican and Helensburgh Anglican make it very easy to find out when and where to go.
3 Friendly faces
Church is about people. St Mark’s, Avalon has a great staff page with well-taken photos and friendly, easy-to-read biographies. Meadowbank International Church has utilised images of people on the homepage to create a welcoming feel.
4 Thinking like an outsider
Some churches have worked hard to make their websites attractive to newcomers. Greystanes-Merrylands West Anglican Church has a clear welcome message to visitors; Valley Heights Community Church has a section called ‘Sundays’ with FAQs like “How long does it go for?”, “What about my children?” and “What should I wear?”. Remember, church is not a familiar place for most Australian web users.
5 More about Christianity
People may not come into our churches but that shouldn’t stop us from sharing the good news with them. Kiama Anglican Churches has a link on the homepage to ‘What is a Christian?’; St James’, Minto has a page of apologetic videos featuring Lee Strobel; and Summer Hill Anglican provides a link to “Christianity” with details of its Christianity Explored course.
6 Social media
West Ryde Anglican Church is experimenting with social media (Facebook, MySpace, and more) as a way of communicating with its members. St Faith’s, Narrabeen has similar tools as well as a novel “Ask a Minister” section. A number of churches like St Matthew’s Ashbury maintain blogs.


The appearance (colour scheme and layout) of many pages can lead to cringing. The internet is a virtual doorstep and most companies and bodies have somthing professional done up.
The best websites are those that have new info updated weekly, with services, upcoming youth events, prayer meetings etc, things that show the church is active and open. This ususlly involves people from each ministery able to access the sections pertaining to their ministery, with the rector having control over the rest.
As a side thought, should all the churches in the diocese have similar schemes, for consistency or 'branding' purposes?
What is the fascination with small pale text?
At least it doesn't have white text on a black background. That would be the worst.
- the pictures are of people and are warm and friendly (and reflect the fact that church is about people).
- information about service times, contact details, location (and even public transport modes) is clear.
- there's a page with information for people who are new to the church.
- upcoming events are listed on the homepage and are (with one exception), up to date.
Lots to learn and be encouraged by.
That is, they haven't asked the question, is this primarily for the outsider to find out about and connect with the church, or is it primarily for the insider as a 'community' builder (and for keeping the congregation informed).
The answer to that question will drive the design.
I think the St Marks, Avalon site you linked to is fantastic. It's clearly targeted at the outsider, but all the info an insider needs is there with a bit of digging (which I think is the right approach). It's uncluttered,and easy to navigate. If I lived on the Northern Beaches, I'd definitely visit this church.
Just want to second, third and fourth that.
It can raise another question as people like Steve flog us clergy to blog. Do the things I want to blog about fit the purpose of our website? stmarks.com.au is designed for outsiders considering visiting our church. This includes non-Christians. I've just started blogging but my blog is really intended to let me think about pastoral ministry 'outloud' and interact with others in similar or related circumstances. I want to be able to use church jargon and refer to books that non-Christians will think weird, talk about controversies and stuff like that. As a consequence my blog links to the church website, but the church website does not link to my blog? Do you reckon that makes sense?
I'd love some reflections from y'all on the website I am currently putting together for my church out in Emu Plains:
http://www.emuplains.anglican.asn.au/
It's not 100% complete yet (and I am guilty of Mistake #6!), but what things could I be doing better? Do you think a blogroll on the main page is a good idea, or a separate page better?
(Okay we're not Anglican - but we're part of Connect09, does that count?).
yep. sounds wise.
Whenever I try to use a program [which supposedly makes it easier] I fall on my face and give up.
Our site does look dodgy. I'd love to get it like some of the ones you've highlighted. but how?
I think the other major problem you mentioned is KEEP IT UP TO DATE. It you want to set up a Web site, think about who is going to maintain it. Remember, if we intend to glorify Jesus in all we do, do it exceptionally well.
It irks me to see some church web sites that are dated, their email addresses are more than their allowance thereby stopping others coming in, and so on. Surely these bad sites puts Christians in a low light when we should indeed be the light of the world through the Holy Spirit.
Keep up the good work of upholding the faith in a practical way.
Kevin
I think a church site should make it easy for the outsider to get the info they want and help create a good impression of the church, even if that means the member has to do a bit more digging to find the prayer points or details of the upcoming youth camp etc.
Trying to build a site that gives both groups equal importance would probably lead to a confused design.
We operate with 3 audiences in mind; the 2 mentioned by Steve - members and potential visitors, but we also want to resource Christians who will never visit our churches, ie in other countries. It's astounding how many visitors download sermon recordings and Bible studies from the sorts of countries you'd think of as being "closed." This group is actually the biggest user of some of our sites (by bandwidth) because some of them will just download almost the entire sermon library!
We're trying to design our sites in such a way that whichever "category" of visitor someone is, the pathway to the information they're looking for is obvious from the front page, right through.
Kevin
The internet provides an almost limitless audience for our content, and what better incentive to have an easy-to-use, up-to-date, content-rich website than to remember that all of our websites have the potential to be visited by many people who may never walk into our churches.
In April I wrote about some of the exciting gospel advancements taking place in 'closed' countries as a result of the internet, see "4 million in 2 years".
I'm currently building a website for a new church plant (using a professional template to show how these can be customised, and also look good). I'm documenting the process, to share with churches how they can create similar websites for themselves, without the need to do a course in web development!
"Congratulations! You've found the new location for our website. Hopefully in early 2007 this site will be fully live."
Their email addresses should be listed in the Diocesan Yearbook