I am far too out of touch with fashion which limits my capacity to comment, but I found it interesting that over the last week in the SMH we saw a bit of a furore over Dunkin Donuts’ choice of clothing to put on their model for their advertising campaign, which incidentally had to be pulled offline.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/05/29/1211654168145.html
A few days afterwards I read that people were jumping around in defense of the celebrity who did not know that what she wore caused insult to various cultures and backgrounds.
http://www.smh.com.au/interactive/2008/world/kaffiyeh/index.html
Then today, I read in the SMH about a NZ councilor donning a costume of the white supremest group Ku Klux Klan into a meeting with the message, “Its wotz under da hood dat counts”.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/outrage-at-kiwi-ku-klux-klan-outfit/2008/05/30/1211654268340.html
I wanted to hear some opinions and thoughts on how clothing could somehow speak a form of an unspoken language, and also the appropriateness of what to wear etc.
This could be quite a lengthy discussion ranging from issues regarding clothing causing others to stumble, cultural backgrounds, the rise of globalisation and the fashion industry and even the all so confusing head coverings of 1 Corinthians 11.
But let’s start with how it is that clothing could speak a form of an unspoken language and the appropriateness of what to wear etc…




Get the latest Sydney stories, Culture and Indepth on your mobile device. Visit sydang.mobi