I have actually had an excellent encounter with the JW’s.
I received a telephone call one day from an elderly man who wanted to make an appointment to see me (as the minister of my parish), he said he was from the JW’s and i agreed to see him.
He was very well mannered and very polite, and I asked him to tell me what he had to say and I would listen and not interrupt. Well, he took me through the Bible from Genesis to Revelation (as most JW’s do), and I listened intently for 45 minutes without interrupting him - as i said, he was a much older man than me, and I didn’t want to be treat him with disrespect. When he had finished, he asked me...“Well, what do you think”
I said, Sir, I am really glad you took this time to explain your views on the scriptures to me, and it seems to me that what you are saying is that there is a great and terrible day of the Lord coming, just as there was in Noah’s day - and just as their was in Noah’s day, God has provided a vehicle for the salvation of his people, and that vehicle is the Jehovah’s Witness church and the WatchTower Society.
I was very pleased and said, “Yes! That’s it exactly!”
I then said, “May I speak now?” He was very gracious and agreed. I then said that I was very badly confused about something, and it was the fact that he had spoken from the Scriptures for 45 minutes about God’s saving plans for his people, but had not mentioned the name of Jesus once. I told him that I agreed that there was a great and terrible day of the Lord coming, and that God had indeed provided a means of salvation for his people, but I could not agree that it was a church - not an Anglican, Methodist, Catholic, Baptist or even Jehovah’s Witness church… his chosen and declared means of salvation was his ONE AND ONLY SON, Jesus, who is he Christ. I took him through the Scriptures again, as he had done for me - Genesis to Revelation - showing him how Jesus was in fact, the great means by which all are saved, and that God’s demand is that all men should place their hope and trust in this one Son, and submit their lives to his saving authority.
When I finished, he was completely silent for quite a while. Then he stood up, shook my hand and left. I have never heard from him again.
I suspect that this might actually be a good way of dealing with JW’s, not debating, but letting them speak, listen, then you present the gospel as it is while they listen. That way, at least you have the opportunity to present the gospel clearly with Jesus as the focus, not arguing about words and translations.
What do you think?
Oh! And on the topic of the word ‘Jehovah’...
My understanding of the development of this corruption of the word YAHWEH is that in the reading of the Hebrew text in ancient times, the word for the name of God was in fact YAHWEH, but in the reading, God’s name was not to be pronounced (for to say the name of God was blasphemous), so at that point in the text, when the reader came across God’s name, there was actually meant to be a silent pause.
However, because mistakes were often made, and God’s name was often accidentally said in the meeting, the ‘pointing’ (vowel sounds) around the consonants was altered to become alien - that is, an unrecognisable word in the Hebrew - Jehovah. As such, when the reader encountered the word, he would not recognise it as an actual Word, realise it was the name of God and be silent at that point.
The problem is that when the Hebrew was tranlated into Latin and other languages, it was the corruption of Yahweh - JEHOVAH was the word rendered as God’s name.
The upshot then is.... Jehovah is how the word is rendered in some forms of the hebrew text, but it is, in fact, not a word at all. It is a deliberate corruption of YAHWEH.
I think F. F. Bruce has the accounting of this in his The Books and the Parchments.