If we took Iraqi refugees, it would obviously be on a non-discriminatory basis - so most of them would be Muslim.
One problem with the application of The Hague Refugees Convention to people from Islamic countries is that it means admitting people who may be persecuted because of their opposition to secular liberal democratic society.
A number of refugees from Algeria have successfully sought asylum in Great Britain on the basis that because they are Islamic fundamentalists dedicated to the violent overthrow of the Algerian Government, they face a well-founded fear of persecution in Algeria.
It would be funny if it wasn’t true.
I’m not saying by any stretch that there would be a significant number of such people, but then it only takes one. And given the fuss over deporting even one Indian doctor because of his blood ties to suicide bombers, you could expect the SMH, the ABC, Julian Burnside and all the other usual suspects to defend to the death Australia’s right to commit civilisational suicide in the event we were to be caught in such a situation again.
It’s worth repeating that the 12,000 refuges Australia takes per year makes us one of the most refugee-friendly countries on earth. During the past decade, the demographic basis of Australia’s society has changed remarkably - we now have significant populations of migrants from African countries most of us hadn’t heard of a few years ago. The man who serves me at Hungry Jacks is very likely to be a survivor of genocide in The Sudan.
Considering we are, as well all know, the most bigotted racist country on the planet under the evil regime of Lord Voldemort, we haven’t done too badly have we?
(Hope everyone doesn’t mind a bit of friendly hyperbole on a Friday afternoon).