Hello again Geoff!
[quote author="Geoff Taylor"]Surely conversion is the first step in spiritual renewal
No doubt, but when you originally said that “the diocesan mission begins with spiritual renewal,” I assumed you were referring to renewal of those already within the church (mainly because the alternative is rather too obvious--of course the first step to spiritual renewal is conversion).
So if “spiritual renewal” does refer to the renewal of those who are already Christians, is there to be no discernible difference between this renewal and conversion?
[quote author="Geoff Taylor"]However, if the Bible is God’s living word ,to see Is 6 merely as descriptive ( that is about Is alone ..describing what happens to him..and therefore not for me) then this can hinder God from speaking to me thru it
I have a few difficulties with this view. First, to say that something is merely descriptive implies that it is in some way less important or relevant than if it were prescriptive. I would argue that this is not the case. If a text is descriptive, does this mean it has nothing to teach me? As I said in a previous post, I think Isa 6 has much to say to us, but I do not think it should be understood prescriptively to define the process of spiritual renewal.
Second, there is a danger that, in assuming that all texts operate prescriptively, too much could be read out of the text. The result would then be that we draw conclusions which are not ultimately warranted by a fair reading of the text itself.
Third, expecting a descriptive text to operate prescriptively may result in us overlooking the descriptive element and thus failing to notice the function of the text in its context. In short, we may find meanings not explicitly in the text whilst missing the true meaning. We are in danger of moving from hearing God speak to putting words in his mouth!
Once again, I am not saying that Isa 6 has nothing to say to us about spiritual renewal. I just would not want to read it as a paradigm for spiritual renewal.
I would be really pleased to hear what passages you feel are more appropriate.
In terms of “spiritual renewal” of Christians, I would think almost any of the NT exhortations about how to live as a Christian. Passages such as Phil 2:1-11, 12-18; Eph 5. Exhortations to grow in love for God and others, to be filled with the Spirit, etc.
Shouldn’t leadership be first convicted by the Spirit that they too may then guide those who they are given to lead?
A good point, I quite agree that they should be so convicted. After all, if the leaders are not it is unlikely they shall lead in this way.
Leaders in the Bible are guides…
I think the point may be more how the leaders guide rather than whether they guide or not. I think that biblical leaders are those leaders who are themselves willing to get down into the dirt with everyone else, lead by example, lead through service as the Messiah himself did. Leadership which is domineering, manipulative, and self-interested is not biblical leadership.
I am not sure I follow your comment on complacency…
By complacency I mean that we, as Christians, tend to be too comfortable with both sin and God. By this I mean that we tend too easily to underrate the significance of most sin and we downplay the greatness of God. We are not struck deeply enough by our own spiritual poverty, let alone the desperate need of those around us, and so we are complacent.
I hope some of this makes sense. Sleep deprivation is not conducive to coherent thought!